Skip to main content

Review of Vikram Vedha - The "Kahani" lets the film down

If there is one movie that is perhaps the Godfather of all dirty-cops-and-gangsters movies, it's gotta be The Departed by Martin Scorsese. Interestingly, it was an adaptation of the hit Hong Kong film Infernal Affairs. While the latter was itself a very popular film, it may not be wrong to say that The Departed has surpassed it by acquiring near cult status.


So, it was with this in mind I wanted to watch Vikram Vedha which is a remake of the Tamil film of the same name. The original film starring Madhavan and Vijay Sethupathi was a huge blockbuster and it was no wonder that the filmmakers were keen to remake it in Hindi with Saif Khan and Hrithik Roshan in the roles of Vikram and Vedha. However, the Hindi remake failed to recreate the magic of the original. Even though the film is supposedly an exact copy, made by the very same filmmakers who directed the original. 

While there has been a bunch of theories about why the Hindi version failed, the consensus has been that "miscasting" is to blame for the film's below par performance at the box-office. That Hrithik Roshan was a bit too glamorous for the role of Vedha and didn't have the gritty, no-nonsense appeal of Sethupathi.

After watching the film (belatedly) on OTT, my take is a bit different. Roshan sure brings a lot of swag to the role of gangster and perhaps even outshines the staid and straight cop played by Saif  Khan. In fact, an extra song was added to the film (Alcoholia)  to cater to Roshan's incredible dancing chops. Sure that does take away a lot from the 'gritty realism' that a dirty-cops-gangster movie needs. But given the stylistic tone of the film, the glamorized gangster is not such a misfit.


The flaw in the movie is its weak storyline. Take for instance  the romantic angle (with Radhika Apte in the role of the cop's wife who is also a lawyer) is an unnecessary add-on and the writers fail to amp up the tension that the situation could have provided.  In fact at one point she even asks her husband if her only role is to be a courier between the cop and the gangster. That in itself is a dead giveaway for the convenient characterization! 


Ironically, the  Vikram Vedha trailer focuses on the "moral dilemmas" (Is every bad act really bad/Is every good deed really good?)  but this does not play out in the movie as powerfully as it should have. The metaphor of Betaal, which is reprised in the form of Vedha raising morality questions, at best adds a bit of frill to the storytelling structure.

Instead what we get is yet another permutation and combination of the dirty-cop-gangster trope with lots of booming action, an even more bombastic background score that's an auditory assault, and an ending that is ambivalent. And the moral issue is happily buried under the gunfire and dead bodies. 


Ultimately, the "kahani" is what lets the film down despite Vedha's  undeniable swag when he asks: "Ek Kahani sunaye Sir?"



Popular posts from this blog

Basu Chatterji's "Balcony Class" Films

Basu Chatterji's Rajnigandha was like a breath of fresh air in the 1970s film universe of Bombay. At a time when the Angry Young Man was beginning to dominate celluloid screens, Amol Palekar was as un-hero-like as you could get. He was the Common Man who traveled in buses, did not have hero-like mannerisms and did not breathe fire and brimstone at his opponents. Basu Chatterji's Middle of the Road Cinema burst on to the scene and surprised the movie-going audience with its everyday situations and storylines that had an undercurrent of humour. Chatterji catered to an audience that he liked to call the "Balcony Class".  Anirudha Bhattacharjee, author of Basu Chatterji and Middle-of-the-Road Cinema writes an entertaining and heartwarming account of the life and work of Basu Chatterji, one of the most under-rated directors of Indian cinema. Recall of Chatterji's brand of feel-good, slice-of-life movies is perhaps highest for his Rajnigandha, Chotisi Baat, Baaton Baa

'Pure Evil' has been my biggest and most complex project - Author Balaji Vittal

Love them or hate them, you simply can't ignore them. That cliche is perhaps most apt when it comes to the bad men of Bollywood. In fact, some of the most memorable lines of dialogue have been mouthed not by the heroes but by the villains of Hindi cinema. So it is only fitting that these shining stars of the dark world (after all, antagonists are the protagonists of their own stories!) deserve to be spotlighted. Balaji Vittal , the author of Pure Evil: the Bad Men of Bollywood undertakes this onerous task of highlighting the world of these evil characters and how they have come to occupy a special place in the hearts and minds of movie goers.  I spoke to Mr. Balaji Vittal, a National Award winning and MAMI Award winning author of Bollywood books, a columnist for News18, Outlook India, The New Indian Express , a Bollywood commentator and a public speaker, about his journey of venturing into the world of Pure Evil .   Here are some excerpts:   Your book "Pure Evil: the Bad Men

Facing my fear - one Pitch at a time

Pitching makes me freeze up. In fact, the very thought of it makes me wanna run away.  For a screenwriter that's simply bad news. Because no matter what, if you want to get your stories out of your computer and hit the big screens, then you need to get comfortable with selling your story to potential producers and studios. And the first step in that journey is pitching.  My fear of pitching has prodded me to find different ways of overcoming the hurdle. So, for a few years I tried to work with agents in the hope that they would read my book and be able to handle the job of pitching. But soon I realized that agents were not into reading. So, I was just another name in their long list of clients. How that helps them grow their business is a different story, and one that I will perhaps share at a later point when I get around to solving that mystery! But the turning point (life does imitate screenplays!) came when I was called to pitch my book to a prominent OTT channel. This was an o